Marijuana Results on the Endocrine. Effects of marijuana on neuroendocrine hormones in human males and females. The exact biochemical processes in the human body which are triggered by the taking of this drug are nonetheless largely unknown. Books, including Bibles, money and newspapers all around the world have been mainly printed on CANNABIS HEMP for as long as these items have existed in human historical past.
United Nations have recognised that any form of dealings with medication – including Cannabis – are worthy of punishment, particularly in the Intoxicating Substances Convention of 1988. The reason given is that the manufacturing of intoxicants and psychotropic substances and the unlawful commerce in such substances “seriously threaten the health and nicely-being of people and injury the financial, cultural and political foundations of society.” (Preamble to the Intoxicating Substances Convention of 1988.) In particular the Convention makes the point that the illegal trade in intoxicants and psychotropic substances exploits youngsters as customers and promotes organised crime “which undermines the authorized financial system and threatens the stability, security and sovereignty of states”. It is true that the injury which the “integration” of this drug would cause to the general public cannot be adequately calculated prematurely given the present unsure state of knowledge on the subject, however on a rough estimate will probably be very excessive. Leaving aside the fact that such interventions could come into query in sure circumstances when they are aimed at preventing the person affected from causing himself severe private harm (see BVerfGE 22, 180 at 219; BVerfGE 58, 208 at 224; BVerfGE 59, 275 at 278; BVerfGE 60, 123 at 132), restrictions are usually only permissible if the safety of others or of the public curiosity requires them, after having due regard to the precept of proportionality.
In balancing the severity of the infringement of the person’s rights in opposition to the gravity and the urgency of the considerations that are adduced to justify the infringement the decisionmaker must keep within the bounds of what can reasonably be demanded of the individual to whom the prohibition is addressed (proportionality within the narrower sense). To the extent that they do this they don’t seem to be disproportionate in the narrower sense because the legislature has left it open to the authorities accountable for the enforcement of the statute to take the limited wrongfulness of the deed under consideration in particular person instances by refraining from the imposition of a penalty (s 29(5) Intoxicating Substances Act) or by refraining from prosecution (s 153 and following of the Criminal Procedure Regulations, s 31a Intoxicating Substances Act). Illegal coping with drugs is comprehensively penalised by ss 29 ff of the Intoxicating Substances Act. The fundamental rule is that any type of dealing with drugs requires official licence (s three of the Act). 2. Without a licence granted underneath s three para 1 number one trades in quantities of drugs which are not insubstantial; or without having obtained them when it comes to a licence granted beneath s 3 para 1 produces or possesses or passes ownership in quantities of medicine which aren’t insubstantial.